Is the 2023 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
17thof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.4 cu ft.
- 17th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (6th of 24), cargo (17th of 24).
- Weakest: power (24th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25,795 | 6th of 24 | 78% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 19th of 24 | 9% | |
| Most horsepower | 152 hp | 24th of 24 | 0% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.4 cu ft | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.3 in | 21st of 23 | 9% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 13th of 21 | 10% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Kia Sportage 39.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 28.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree