Is the 2025 Buick Encore GX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
12thof 20
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.5 cu ft.
- 12th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (8th of 19), price (10th of 20).
- Weakest: towing (9th of 11, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25,940 | 10th of 20 | 53% | |
| Best combined mpg | 30 mpg | 8th of 19 | 56% | |
| Most horsepower | 155 hp | 15th of 20 | 21% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.5 cu ft | 12th of 20 | 42% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.0 in | 14th of 19 | 28% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 9th of 11 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
Show all 20
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree