Is the 2022 Mazda CX-5 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
14thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 29.1 cu ft.
- 14th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (7th of 24), rear legroom (8th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (19th of 24, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $26,250 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 19th of 24 | 4% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 29.1 cu ft | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.6 in | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 7th of 21 | 45% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda CR-V 39.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Tiguan 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 36.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Subaru Outback 32.5 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 28.9 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree