Is the 2020 Mazda CX-5 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
10thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.9 cu ft.
- 10th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (5th of 23), cargo (10th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (8th of 21, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25,190 | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 8th of 24 | 57% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.9 cu ft | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.6 in | 5th of 23 | 82% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 8th of 21 | 45% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Buick Envision 57.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 39.3 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.0 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 31.1 cu ft
Show all 24
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 25.8 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Lexus NX 17.7 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree