Is the 2020 Ford EcoSport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 10 SUVs
3rdof 10
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.9 cu ft.
- 3rd of 10 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (2nd of 10), price (3rd of 10).
- Weakest: towing (2nd of 6, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $19,995 | 3rd of 10 | 78% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 5th of 10 | 33% | |
| Most horsepower | 166 hp | 5th of 10 | 56% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.9 cu ft | 3rd of 10 | 78% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.7 in | 2nd of 10 | 89% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 2nd of 6 | 20% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Venue 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
Show all 10
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 10 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree