Is the 2020 Nissan Kicks a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
5thof 21
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.3 cu ft.
- 5th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (1st of 21), mpg (2nd of 21).
- Weakest: power (21st of 21).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $19,070 | 1st of 21 | 100% | |
| Best combined mpg | 33 mpg | 2nd of 21 | 95% | |
| Most horsepower | 122 hp | 21st of 21 | 0% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.3 cu ft | 5th of 21 | 80% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.2 in | 20th of 21 | 5% | |
| Max towing | 1,200 lb | 13th of 16 | 20% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
Show all 21
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree