Is the 2026 Nissan Kicks a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 15 SUVs
2ndof 15
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.0 cu ft.
- 2nd of 15 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (2nd of 15), cargo (2nd of 15).
- Weakest: power (14th of 15).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,730 | 2nd of 15 | 93% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 3rd of 14 | 62% | |
| Most horsepower | 141 hp | 14th of 15 | 7% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.0 cu ft | 2nd of 15 | 93% | |
| Rear legroom | 34.5 in | 13th of 15 | 14% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
Show all 15
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 15 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree