Is the 2021 Nissan Kicks a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
9thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.3 cu ft.
- 9th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 24), price (3rd of 24).
- Weakest: power (23rd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $19,600 | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Best combined mpg | 33 mpg | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Most horsepower | 122 hp | 23rd of 24 | 4% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.3 cu ft | 9th of 24 | 61% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.5 in | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Max towing | 1,200 lb | 14th of 17 | 19% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Tiguan 37.6 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 31.1 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
Show all 24
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Venue 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree