Is the 2025 Nissan Kicks a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 16 SUVs
2ndof 16
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.0 cu ft.
- 2nd of 16 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 16), price (2nd of 16).
- Weakest: towing (7th of 9, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $21,520 | 2nd of 16 | 87% | |
| Best combined mpg | 33 mpg | 2nd of 16 | 87% | |
| Most horsepower | 141 hp | 14th of 16 | 7% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.0 cu ft | 2nd of 16 | 93% | |
| Rear legroom | 34.5 in | 13th of 15 | 14% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 7th of 9 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
Show all 16
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree