Is the 2023 Lexus NX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
21stof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.7 cu ft.
- 21st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (3rd of 18), price (9th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (21st of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $38,605 | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Best combined mpg | 39 mpg | 3rd of 18 | 88% | |
| Most horsepower | 304 hp | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.7 cu ft | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 13th of 20 | 26% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Kia Sportage 39.6 cu ft
- Honda CR-V 39.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ4X 27.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 27.2 cu ft
- Audi Q5 25.9 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 24.7 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Nissan Ariya 22.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree