Is the 2023 Ford Edge a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
2ndof 23
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 39.2 cu ft.
- 2nd of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 23), rear legroom (3rd of 23).
- Weakest: mpg (16th of 21, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $37,945 | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 16th of 21 | 10% | |
| Most horsepower | 335 hp | 13th of 24 | 43% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 39.2 cu ft | 2nd of 23 | 95% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.6 in | 3rd of 23 | 91% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 7th of 20 | 32% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Volkswagen Tiguan 37.6 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 36.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 31.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-50 31.4 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota Venza 28.8 cu ft
- BMW X3 28.7 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 18.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
No figure: VinFast VF8.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree