Is the 2023 Mercedes-Benz GLA a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
22ndof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 15.4 cu ft.
- 22nd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (4th of 24), rear legroom (4th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $37,500 | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 6th of 21 | 70% | |
| Most horsepower | 382 hp | 4th of 24 | 87% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 15.4 cu ft | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.4 in | 4th of 23 | 86% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree