Is the 2023 Audi Q3 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
13thof 24
- No. Top half on 0 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.7 cu ft.
- 13th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (13th of 24), price (14th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (17th of 19, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $36,800 | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 16th of 20 | 21% | |
| Most horsepower | 228 hp | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.7 cu ft | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 17th of 23 | 18% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 17th of 19 | 6% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
Show all 24
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree