Is the 2023 BMW X2 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
13thof 23
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.6 cu ft.
- 13th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 19), rear legroom (10th of 22).
- Weakest: price (16th of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $36,600 | 16th of 23 | 32% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 8th of 22 | 52% | |
| Most horsepower | 241 hp | 11th of 23 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.6 cu ft | 13th of 23 | 45% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.7 in | 10th of 22 | 57% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 2nd of 19 | 83% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona N 19.2 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree