Is the 2026 Mercedes-Benz GLA a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
23rdof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 15.4 cu ft.
- 23rd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (5th of 16), rear legroom (6th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (23rd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $41,500 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 5th of 16 | 73% | |
| Most horsepower | 302 hp | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 15.4 cu ft | 23rd of 24 | 4% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 6th of 23 | 73% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.8 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.4 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
Show all 24
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 26.1 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree