Is the 2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee L a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
9thof 22
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 46.9 cu ft.
- 9th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (5th of 22), price (7th of 22).
- Weakest: power (18th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40,920 | 7th of 22 | 71% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 7th of 19 | 56% | |
| Most horsepower | 324 hp | 18th of 22 | 19% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 46.9 cu ft | 9th of 22 | 62% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.4 in | 13th of 22 | 38% | |
| Max towing | 6,200 lb | 5th of 22 | 81% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.5 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Toyota Grand Highlander 57.9 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 57.3 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 48.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
Show all 22
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 46.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 46.3 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 46.0 cu ft
- Kia EV9 43.5 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Aviator 42.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-70 39.6 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ V 28.0 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 22.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 22.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 9 21.9 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree