Is the 2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee L a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
14thof 20
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.2 cu ft.
- 14th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (7th of 20), price (9th of 20).
- Weakest: power (16th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $42,035 | 9th of 20 | 58% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 11th of 20 | 26% | |
| Most horsepower | 293 hp | 16th of 20 | 21% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.2 cu ft | 14th of 20 | 32% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.4 in | 7th of 20 | 63% | |
| Max towing | 6,200 lb | 9th of 20 | 58% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.6 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 48.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 46.0 cu ft
Show all 20
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 27.1 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree