Is the 2023 Honda Passport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
1stof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 50.5 cu ft.
- 1st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 24), rear legroom (2nd of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (13th of 17, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $41,100 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 13th of 17 | 13% | |
| Most horsepower | 280 hp | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 50.5 cu ft | 1st of 24 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.6 in | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 4th of 21 | 80% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda Passport 50.5 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ4X 27.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Nissan Ariya 22.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree