Is the 2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee L a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
17thof 22
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.2 cu ft.
- 17th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (8th of 22), towing (8th of 21).
- Weakest: power (19th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40,035 | 8th of 22 | 67% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 13th of 21 | 25% | |
| Most horsepower | 293 hp | 19th of 22 | 14% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.2 cu ft | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.4 in | 12th of 22 | 48% | |
| Max towing | 6,200 lb | 8th of 21 | 65% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.6 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 56.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 48.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
Show all 22
- Kia Telluride 46.0 cu ft
- Kia EV9 43.5 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 35.8 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 23.0 cu ft
- Toyota Grand Highlander 20.6 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree