Is the 2020 Mercedes-Benz GLA a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
1stof 22
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 44.0 cu ft.
- 1st of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 22), mpg (5th of 22).
- Weakest: price (15th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $34,250 | 15th of 22 | 33% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 5th of 22 | 62% | |
| Most horsepower | 208 hp | 15th of 22 | 33% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 44.0 cu ft | 1st of 22 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
Show all 22
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 24.2 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree