Is the 2020 Volvo XC40 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
23rdof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 23rd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (10th of 24), mpg (10th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (23rd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $33,700 | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 10th of 24 | 48% | |
| Most horsepower | 248 hp | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 23rd of 24 | 4% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 14th of 23 | 36% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 25.8 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 24.2 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree