Is the 2025 Volvo XC40 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
21stof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 21st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (5th of 19), price (13th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (21st of 24, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40,650 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 13th of 19 | 22% | |
| Most horsepower | 247 hp | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 21st of 24 | 4% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 17th of 22 | 10% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 5th of 19 | 67% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.2 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
Show all 24
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree