Is the 2020 BMW X1 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
13thof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.1 cu ft.
- 13th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (6th of 24), cargo (13th of 24).
- Weakest: power (19th of 24, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $35,200 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 6th of 24 | 70% | |
| Most horsepower | 228 hp | 19th of 24 | 17% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.1 cu ft | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 17th of 23 | 27% | |
| Max towing | 3,000 lb | 14th of 21 | 25% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Buick Envision 57.3 cu ft
- Honda Passport 50.5 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- BMW X1 27.1 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Lexus NX 17.7 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree