Is the 2023 BMW X1 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
12thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.7 cu ft.
- 12th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (8th of 19), towing (8th of 19).
- Weakest: price (16th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39,100 | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 8th of 19 | 56% | |
| Most horsepower | 241 hp | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.7 cu ft | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 15th of 23 | 36% | |
| Max towing | 3,000 lb | 8th of 19 | 56% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
Show all 24
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree