Is the 2023 Mazda CX-9 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
20thof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 14.4 cu ft.
- 20th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (6th of 23), mpg (5th of 23).
- Weakest: power (24th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $38,750 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 5th of 23 | 55% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 24th of 24 | 0% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 14.4 cu ft | 20th of 22 | 10% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.4 in | 6th of 23 | 73% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 22nd of 24 | 4% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 48.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 46.0 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
Show all 22
- Subaru Ascent 42.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 27.1 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 12.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz GLE, Polestar 3.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree