Is the 2023 Jeep Cherokee a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
12thof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.8 cu ft.
- 12th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (5th of 24), cargo (12th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (18th of 21, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $37,695 | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 13th of 22 | 43% | |
| Most horsepower | 270 hp | 16th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.8 cu ft | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.3 in | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 18th of 21 | 5% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 48.5 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 46.0 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 25.8 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree