Is the 2026 Jeep Cherokee a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
7thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 33.6 cu ft.
- 7th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (3rd of 16), price (6th of 24).
- Weakest: power (22nd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $35,000 | 6th of 24 | 74% | |
| Best combined mpg | 37 mpg | 3rd of 16 | 80% | |
| Most horsepower | 210 hp | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 33.6 cu ft | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.5 in | 11th of 23 | 55% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 5th of 20 | 37% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda Passport 44.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 40.5 cu ft
- Honda CR-V 39.3 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.5 cu ft
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ Woodland 33.8 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 33.6 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-50 31.4 cu ft
- Subaru Trailseeker 31.3 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 30.6 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.8 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ 26.0 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ V 26.0 cu ft
- Acura ADX 24.4 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 13.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree