Is the 2020 MINI Countryman a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
22ndof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.6 cu ft.
- 22nd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (1st of 24), rear legroom (6th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $28,400 | 20th of 24 | 17% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 6th of 24 | 74% | |
| Most horsepower | 301 hp | 1st of 24 | 96% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.6 cu ft | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 6th of 23 | 77% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 24.2 cu ft
Show all 24
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree