Is the 2022 MINI Countryman a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
21stof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.6 cu ft.
- 21st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (7th of 24), power (8th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (21st of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29,100 | 18th of 24 | 26% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 8th of 23 | 64% | |
| Most horsepower | 221 hp | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.6 cu ft | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona N 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree