Is the 2022 Ford Bronco Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
1stof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.5 cu ft.
- 1st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 24), power (5th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (17th of 23, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $28,815 | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 17th of 23 | 9% | |
| Most horsepower | 250 hp | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.5 cu ft | 1st of 24 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.9 in | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Max towing | 2,200 lb | 4th of 16 | 80% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree