Is the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
1stof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.5 cu ft.
- 1st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 24), power (8th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (17th of 23, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $31,695 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 17th of 23 | 18% | |
| Most horsepower | 250 hp | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.5 cu ft | 1st of 24 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.9 in | 11th of 22 | 52% | |
| Max towing | 2,700 lb | 5th of 14 | 69% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree