Is the 2026 MINI Countryman a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
11thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.0 cu ft.
- 11th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (7th of 24), cargo (11th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (9th of 17, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $38,900 | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 9th of 17 | 31% | |
| Most horsepower | 312 hp | 7th of 24 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.0 cu ft | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 9th of 23 | 55% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 26.1 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree