Is the 2026 Mazda CX-90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
8thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 40.1 cu ft.
- 8th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (7th of 24), rear legroom (5th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (5th of 19, tied with 6).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39,300 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 6th of 18 | 71% | |
| Most horsepower | 340 hp | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 40.1 cu ft | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.4 in | 5th of 24 | 74% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 5th of 19 | 44% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 46.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 46.3 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 46.0 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 42.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-90 40.1 cu ft
Show all 24
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Subaru Trailseeker 31.3 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Honda Prologue 25.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree