Is the 2025 Mazda CX-90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
7thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 40.1 cu ft.
- 7th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (5th of 24), power (7th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (6th of 19, tied with 6).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $38,045 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 5th of 19 | 72% | |
| Most horsepower | 340 hp | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 40.1 cu ft | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.4 in | 5th of 24 | 78% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 6th of 19 | 39% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 46.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 45.8 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 42.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-90 40.1 cu ft
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Toyota bZ4X 27.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Nissan Ariya 22.8 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 18.6 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree