Is the 2020 Jeep Wrangler a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
2ndof 22
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 31.7 cu ft.
- 2nd of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 22), towing (2nd of 15).
- Weakest: mpg (21st of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $28,295 | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 21st of 22 | 5% | |
| Most horsepower | 285 hp | 4th of 22 | 86% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 31.7 cu ft | 2nd of 22 | 95% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.3 in | 2nd of 21 | 90% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 2nd of 15 | 93% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 24.2 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
Show all 22
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree