Is the 2026 Jeep Wrangler a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
8thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 31.7 cu ft.
- 8th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (5th of 24), cargo (8th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (16th of 17, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $36,035 | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 16th of 17 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 470 hp | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 31.7 cu ft | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.3 in | 11th of 23 | 55% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 6th of 20 | 26% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda Passport 44.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 40.5 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.5 cu ft
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Subaru Outback 34.6 cu ft
- Toyota bZ Woodland 33.8 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 33.6 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-50 31.4 cu ft
- Subaru Trailseeker 31.3 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 30.6 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.8 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 27.6 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ 26.0 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ V 26.0 cu ft
- Acura ADX 24.4 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 13.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree