Is the 2020 Subaru Outback a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
16thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.5 cu ft.
- 16th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 24), price (5th of 24).
- Weakest: power (18th of 24, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $26,645 | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 2nd of 24 | 91% | |
| Most horsepower | 260 hp | 18th of 24 | 17% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.5 cu ft | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.5 in | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 16th of 24 | 22% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Passport 50.5 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 41.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 39.3 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 35.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.0 cu ft
- Subaru Outback 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.1 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Chevrolet Blazer 30.5 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- Dodge Journey 10.7 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree