Is the 2026 Mercedes-Benz GLS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
17thof 20
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.4 cu ft.
- 17th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (2nd of 19), mpg (4th of 14).
- Weakest: cargo (17th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $90,250 | 13th of 20 | 37% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 4th of 14 | 69% | |
| Most horsepower | 603 hp | 10th of 20 | 53% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.4 cu ft | 17th of 20 | 16% | |
| Rear legroom | 43.4 in | 2nd of 19 | 94% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 10th of 19 | 28% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 69.9 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 56.3 cu ft
- Lucid Gravity 50.6 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
Show all 20
- Tesla Model X 37.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 35.8 cu ft
- Audi Q7 35.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- Cadillac VISTIQ 15.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree