Is the 2026 Cadillac Escalade a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 8 SUVs
1stof 8
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 72.9 cu ft.
- 1st of 8 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (1st of 8), cargo (1st of 8).
- Weakest: mpg (5th of 7, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $91,100 | 7th of 8 | 14% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 5th of 7 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 682 hp | 1st of 8 | 100% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 72.9 cu ft | 1st of 8 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 41.8 in | 5th of 8 | 43% | |
| Max towing | 8,100 lb | 6th of 8 | 29% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 69.9 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 56.3 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Cadillac VISTIQ 15.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 8 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree