Is the 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 SUVs
15thof 18
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.4 cu ft.
- 15th of 18 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 16), mpg (4th of 12).
- Weakest: cargo (15th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $89,200 | 12th of 18 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 4th of 12 | 73% | |
| Most horsepower | 603 hp | 7th of 18 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.4 cu ft | 15th of 18 | 18% | |
| Rear legroom | 43.4 in | 1st of 16 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 8th of 17 | 38% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 72.5 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 69.9 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
Show all 18
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Lotus Eletre 24.0 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 22.0 cu ft
- Lucid Gravity 21.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 18 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree