Is the 2024 Mercedes-Benz GLS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 SUVs
13thof 17
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.4 cu ft.
- 13th of 17 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (2nd of 15), mpg (3rd of 13).
- Weakest: cargo (13th of 17).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $87,000 | 12th of 19 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 3rd of 13 | 67% | |
| Most horsepower | 603 hp | 7th of 18 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.4 cu ft | 13th of 17 | 25% | |
| Rear legroom | 43.4 in | 2nd of 15 | 93% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 7th of 17 | 38% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
Show all 17
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Acura ZDX 29.7 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Lotus Eletre, VinFast VF9.
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree