Is the 2023 Mercedes-Benz GLS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 14 SUVs
11thof 14
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.4 cu ft.
- 11th of 14 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (2nd of 13), power (5th of 15).
- Weakest: cargo (11th of 14).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $81,800 | 10th of 15 | 36% | |
| Best combined mpg | 20 mpg | 5th of 12 | 64% | |
| Most horsepower | 603 hp | 5th of 15 | 71% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.4 cu ft | 11th of 14 | 23% | |
| Rear legroom | 43.4 in | 2nd of 13 | 92% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 8th of 15 | 29% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
Show all 14
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 15 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree