Is the 2023 Land Rover Range Rover Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
11thof 22
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.0 cu ft.
- 11th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (3rd of 21), mpg (6th of 18).
- Weakest: price (17th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $83,000 | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 6th of 18 | 53% | |
| Most horsepower | 523 hp | 8th of 23 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.0 cu ft | 11th of 22 | 52% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 13th of 19 | 33% | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 3rd of 21 | 90% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Lexus GX 46.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
Show all 22
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree