Is the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
9thof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 31.9 cu ft.
- 9th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (3rd of 24), towing (3rd of 24).
- Weakest: price (17th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $79,700 | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 8th of 16 | 40% | |
| Most horsepower | 626 hp | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 31.9 cu ft | 9th of 22 | 62% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.8 in | 14th of 20 | 32% | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 3rd of 24 | 83% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 37.5 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 36.4 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
Show all 22
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer S 30.6 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 Coupe 29.3 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.3 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- Polestar 3 17.1 cu ft
No figure: Genesis GV80, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree