Is the 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
10thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.5 cu ft.
- 10th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (3rd of 20), power (5th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (13th of 19, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $68,650 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 3rd of 20 | 84% | |
| Most horsepower | 575 hp | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.5 cu ft | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 13th of 19 | 28% | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 4th of 22 | 81% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 68.0 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
Show all 24
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- Jaguar I PACE 25.3 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.6 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree