Is the 2020 Audi Q8 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
9thof 23
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.5 cu ft.
- 9th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (2nd of 19), cargo (9th of 23).
- Weakest: power (20th of 23, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $68,200 | 12th of 23 | 50% | |
| Best combined mpg | 18 mpg | 14th of 21 | 30% | |
| Most horsepower | 335 hp | 20th of 23 | 9% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.5 cu ft | 9th of 23 | 64% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.2 in | 2nd of 19 | 94% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 8th of 21 | 45% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
Show all 23
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 15.3 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 15.2 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree