Mercedes-Benz GLS year by year: price, power, mpg, size
Base price change, 2017 to 2026
+35%
- Base price: $67,050 (2017) to $90,250 (2026).
- Median SUV base price: +39% over the same years.
- Redesigned: 2018, 2020.
- Years since the last redesign: 6.
| Year | Trims | Base MSRP | Top MSRP | Horsepower | MPG or range | Length | Wheelbase | Curb weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | $90,250 | $180,000 | 375 to 603 hp | 15 to 21 mpg | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | 5,523 lb |
| 2025 | 5 | $89,200 | $178,450 | 375 to 603 hp | 15 to 21 mpg | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | 5,545 lb |
| 2024 | 5 | $87,000 | $174,350 | 375 to 603 hp | 16 to 21 mpg | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | 5,489 lb |
| 2023 | 5 | $81,800 | $170,000 | 362 to 603 hp | 16 to 20 mpg | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | N/A |
| 2022 | 5 | $77,850 | $165,100 | 362 to 603 hp | 15 to 20 mpg | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | N/A |
| 2021 | 5 | $76,000 | $160,500 | 362 to 603 hp | 16 to 21 mpg | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | 5,467 lb |
| 2020 | 2 | N/A | N/A | 362 to 483 hp | N/A | 205.0 in | 123.4 in | N/A |
| 2019 | 3 | $70,150 | $126,150 | 362 to 577 hp | 15 to 18 mpg | 202.0 in | 121.1 in | 5,335 lb |
| 2018 | 3 | $69,550 | $125,300 | 362 to 577 hp | 15 to 19 mpg | 202.0 in | 121.1 in | 5,379 lb |
| 2017 | 4 | $67,050 | $124,100 | 255 to 577 hp | 14 to 19 mpg | 201.6 in | 121.1 in | 5,335 lb |
What changed each year
| Year | Vs | What changed |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | Base price +$1,050. |
| 2025 | 2024 | Base price +$2,200. |
| 2024 | 2023 | Base price +$5,200. +13 hp. +1 mpg. |
| 2023 | 2022 | Base price +$3,950. |
| 2022 | 2021 | Base price +$1,850. -1 mpg. |
| 2021 | 2020 | 3 more trims. |
| 2020 | 2019 | Redesign. 1 fewer trim. Length +3.0 in. Wheelbase +2.3 in. |
| 2019 | 2018 | Base price +$600. -1 mpg. |
| 2018 | 2017 | Redesign. 1 fewer trim. Base price +$2,500. +107 hp. |
What this cannot tell you
Specs of the cheapest trim each year. Other trims differ.
Redesigns found from size and power changes only.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree