Is the 2023 Volvo S60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 16 sedans
12thof 16
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 11.6 cu ft.
- 12th of 16 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 22), power (7th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (12th of 16).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $41,300 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 2nd of 22 | 95% | |
| Most horsepower | 455 hp | 7th of 24 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 11.6 cu ft | 12th of 16 | 27% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.2 in | 11th of 24 | 48% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A4 Allroad 24.2 cu ft
- Tesla Model 3 19.8 cu ft
- BMW 3 Series 17.0 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Elantra N 14.0 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Subaru WRX 12.5 cu ft
Show all 16
- Audi A4 12.0 cu ft
- Audi S4 12.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Volvo S60 11.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Lexus IS 10.8 cu ft
- Cadillac CT4 10.7 cu ft
- Genesis G70 10.5 cu ft
No figure: Alfa Romeo Giulia, Audi A5 Sportback, Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing, Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz CLA, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon, Volkswagen Jetta GLI.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree