Is the 2022 Volvo S60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 sedans
8thof 17
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 13.8 cu ft.
- 8th of 17 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 23), power (6th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (12th of 24, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39,250 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 2nd of 23 | 95% | |
| Most horsepower | 455 hp | 6th of 24 | 74% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 13.8 cu ft | 8th of 17 | 56% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.2 in | 12th of 24 | 43% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A4 Allroad 24.2 cu ft
- Tesla Model 3 19.8 cu ft
- BMW 3 Series 17.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Passat 15.9 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Elantra N 14.0 cu ft
- Volvo S60 13.8 cu ft
Show all 17
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Subaru WRX 12.5 cu ft
- Acura ILX 12.4 cu ft
- Audi A4 12.0 cu ft
- Audi S4 12.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Lexus IS 10.8 cu ft
- Cadillac CT4 10.7 cu ft
- Genesis G70 10.5 cu ft
No figure: Alfa Romeo Giulia, Audi A5 Sportback, Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz CLA, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon, Volkswagen Jetta GLI.
Sedans in 2022: 92. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree