Is the 2023 Lexus ES a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 sedans
7thof 17
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 13.9 cu ft.
- 7th of 17 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (1st of 18), rear legroom (5th of 20).
- Weakest: towing (5th of 7, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $41,940 | 11th of 20 | 47% | |
| Best combined mpg | 44 mpg | 1st of 18 | 100% | |
| Most horsepower | 302 hp | 16th of 20 | 21% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 13.9 cu ft | 7th of 17 | 63% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.3 in | 5th of 20 | 79% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 5th of 7 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Dodge Charger 16.5 cu ft
- Chrysler 300 16.3 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 14.0 cu ft
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
Show all 17
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Volvo S60 11.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree